¶¶ÒõÖ±²¥

¶¶ÒõÖ±²¥

Farming must be part of the climate change solution

Major land use changes will be required to sequester more carbon and thereby offset emissions.

Ìý

Following this week’s report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ¶¶ÒõÖ±²¥â€™s Professor Davy McCracken looks at what the hard-hitting report means for Scotland’s food producers.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was created to provide policymakers with regular scientific assessments on climate change and to put forward options to help adapt and mitigate the implications and risks associated with a warming planet.

The most recentÌýÌýwas published earlier this week andÌýit is stark and hard-hitting. The weight of evidence is overwhelming, with the full report running to thousands of pages and even theÌýsummary for policymakers ‘only’ being 40 pages long.Ìý

Nevertheless, the main thrust can be summarised as follows:Ìý

  • The extreme events (e.g. floods, droughts and wildfires) we are seeing across the globe are down to climate change, and it is unequivocable that human activities have driven that change
  • The planet is now warming rapidly, with the result that such extreme events will occur much more regularly and it’s going to get worse before it gets better
  • And it will only get better – in terms of reducing the amount of warming that will occur by the middle of the century – if marked reductions in CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions occur in the coming decades

We know that farming is an important emitter of greenhouse gases and hence there is a need to change farming practices and systems to reduce the amount of those emissions in the future.Ìý

But as well as being part of the problem, farming also has a major role to play in being part of the solution.ÌýIn particular,ÌýmajorÌýland use changes will be required to sequester more carbon and thereby offset the emissions that – although reduced – will continue to be associated with our food production.Ìý

Addressing the ongoingÌýclimateÌýemergencyÌý-ÌýandÌýthe associatedÌýbiodiversityÌýcrisisÌý– will thereforeÌýmeanÌýfarmers andÌýcroftersÌýin ScotlandÌýadopting a new direction of travel, one which involves producing wider environmental outcomes in addition to agricultural products.Ìý

¶¶ÒõÖ±²¥ and SAC ConsultingÌýplayÌýa leading role in developing new approaches toÌýtheÌýmeasurement and mitigation ofÌýgreenhouse gas emissionsÌýfromÌýfarming. And we are also involved in a wide range of initiatives providing advice on how those approaches could be implemented on the ground.Ìý

Last year, the Scottish Government asked myself and colleagues ifÌýincreasingÌýÌýonÌýdirect paymentsÌý(i.e. requiring land managers to do more actions on the ground voluntarily in order to qualify for public funding)Ìýcould help deliver the scale ofÌýenvironmentalÌýbenefits that is needed.Ìý

The simple answer wasÌý‘Yes’ andÌýthat this could help provide a range of water quality,ÌýbiodiversityÌýand climate change benefits.Ìý

For example, making it mandatory for all farms to establish and fence-off wide margins next to watercoursesÌýwould provide water quality and biodiversity benefits. And conducting a carbon audit and putting in place a nutrient management planÌýwould identify where greenhouse gas emissions could be reduced.Ìý

ButÌýwe also highlighted thatÌýit willÌýbe essential toÌýembedÌýthisÌýapproachÌýwithin a new wider package of supportÌýdesigned toÌýhelpÌýthe transitionÌýofÌýfarmers andÌýcroftersÌýtoÌýthe newÌýways of workingÌýrequired.ÌýÌý

TwoÌýrecently publishedÌýreports will hopefullyÌýhelpÌýstimulateÌýfurther consideration of what such aÌýcommon frameworkÌýneeds to look like.Ìý

TheÌýFarming for 1.5 DegreesÌýfinal reportÌýÌýand a policy briefing from NFUS onÌýÌýprovide suggestionsÌýon howÌýfutureÌýpolicy couldÌýdeliver on food production, climate change and biodiversity.Ìý

TheÌýNFUS briefing pulls together the recent work of the fiveÌýÌý– including the one focussed on Hill, Upland & Crofting -ÌýandÌýhence is intended toÌýsuggest aÌýcommonÌýway forwardÌýfor both farming and crofting in Scotland.Ìý

Both reports acknowledgeÌýthe need forÌýa transition period toÌýa new support policyÌýandÌýforÌýthatÌýnewÌýframeworkÌýtoÌýreward those who deliver on public goods.ÌýJust as importantly, both reports urge the Scottish Government to start the process of transition as soonÌýas possible.Ìý

The need for urgency is echoed in the IPCC report, where it emphasises that ifÌýgovernmentsÌýdon’t start down the pathway to Net-Zero now,Ìýthe scale of the problem will only get bigger.ÌýÌý

And getting bigger doesn’t justÌýsimplyÌýmean the danger of global temperature increasing by more thanÌýtwoÌýdegrees centigrade. It also means that the more the temperature rises above that level,Ìýthe more extreme and unpredictable climate events will become.Ìý

ThereÌýhas been a lot of talkÌýaboutÌýhow agricultural support in Scotland could potentially change in the short,ÌýmediumÌýand long-term.ÌýÌý

ButÌýwhat we particularly need now is action. SoÌýit is essential thatÌýwe moveÌýon from discussionsÌýaboutÌýwhatÌý‘could’Ìýbe doneÌýand instead put in place the policy framework that ensures that the actions that ‘need’ to happen on the ground ‘will’ actually happen.Ìý

Only by doing that willÌýit become clearer toÌýour farmers and croftersÌýwhatÌýlarge-scaleÌýchangesÌýthey need to start makingÌýto their systems and practicesÌýnow,Ìýbefore itÌýbecomesÌýtoo late to make anyÌýrealÌýdifference.Ìý

ProfessorÌýDavy McCrackenÌý
Head of ¶¶ÒõÖ±²¥â€™sÌýHill & Mountain Research CentreÌý

Further readingÌý
Ìý


Posted by ¶¶ÒõÖ±²¥ on 11/08/2021

Tags: Climate and Environment, Agriculture, Soil and Crops, Rural Policy Centre
Categories: Research